Consider Deception!

Don’t you just hate it when someone lies to you?  The closer the person is or the more authority they wield over you makes it even more egregious!   Those in authority, especially in the education of the next generation, have a clear-cut moral mandate to speak truth to those needing to hear it.  They are forming the foundational world view of all who depend on them for the facts of history, science, life, health, etc.

Virtually everyone with a public education has seen the drawings of the stages of the embryo and heard the story of ‘recapitulation’ they portray.  The problem is they are fake.  Those drawings were exposed as fraudulent in the 1880’s!  And yet they are still in modern textbooks as proof of the theory of evolution.

There is not now nor has there ever been one shred of valid evidence supporting the theory of evolution!  The light and dark moths in England are cited as proof, but they are still moths!  Darwin’s finches are cited as proof, but they are still finches!  There is not now nor has there ever been an argument against micro-evolution—changes within a species.  All of the various breeds of dog probably did descend from a common ancestor, the wolf.  But all are still canine!  All of the various breeds of cats probably descended from a common ancestor.  But they are all still feline!

The fossil record has yielded not a single instance or example of a missing link between species, plant or animal!  And yet we are still told that evolution (change from one species into a different one) is a fact.

The whole motive behind the theory of evolution isn’t science.  Science has not been able to prove the theory!  No, the motive behind the theory of evolution and its corollary, a very ancient earth, is very simple.   The fool has said in his heart, there is no God!  For, if there is a God of creation, man is morally accountable to Him because He has given us rules and laws to live by.  So if we just eliminate Him from our lives we are no longer accountable!

You know, I think I’ll quit believing in gravity!  That way, when I fall I won’t hit the ground!!

I know, I know!  Gravity doesn’t care whether I believe in it or not.  If I fall I will still hit the ground and it will still hurt!

But God DOES care.  That’s why He has revealed Himself to us, and given us rules and laws to live by.  But as with gravity, denying Him does not eliminate Him from our reality.  It just turns the wisdom of the one denying Him into foolishness.

Advertisements

Guilty by Association

Vapors In The Wind

There are perhaps none so gullible as Christians. Any marketer will tell you that. You simply have to put the label “Christian” on a book or cd, and they will buy it. I am horrified by much of what is screened on TBN and similar television channels, or by much of what is sold in CUM Books, for example. The theology is terrible, much of it is exploitative or illogical, and still it gets lapped up. Christians who consume the products become increasingly entangled in fear and guilt, and feel pressured to buy more so that they can assuage those feelings.

It’s a thought-provoking comment on the insidious brilliance of marketers, and a sad indictment on Christians. The real product these people offer you is not Christianity, it is false hope: the promise of riches, and love, and health. For those who would argue for the legitimacy of “Christian” TV…

View original post 838 more words

Choosing What to Believe!

How do you know what to believe?  We are inundated by the information stream of media.  Many just tune out, not caring about believing anything just getting along as best they can.  Or, believing what they don’t have to work very hard at.

I’ve heard of Christ and I don’t want to go to Hell so I guess I’ll believe in Him!  Or, I don’t believe in anything I can’t see with my own eyes!  Or, everybody that has really studied it says the universe is fifteen to twenty billion years old and they should know so I guess I’ll believe them and most of what they believe about the age of the Earth, Sun, Moon and stars.

There is so much pain and suffering in the world, I just can’t bring myself to believe in a God who would allow that!  So I’ll reject religion and rely on myself!

None of the above shows the personal responsibility required of us, to actually seek the Truth!  Each of them makes a choice based on what they’ve heard or felt would be a choice they could live with, a choice that wouldn’t cost much in terms of time and effort.  They make a choice based on someone else’s belief and continue in it as long as its convenient.

Do yourself a favor.  Find out what is True and Believe in That!  But please bear in mind that there is one small obstacle that must be overcome:

“What comes out of a person is what defiles him.  For from within, out of the heart of man, come evil thoughts, sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery,  coveting, wickedness, deceit, sensuality, envy, slander, pride, foolishness.  All these evil things come from within, and they defile a person.”

Do you think that can be overcome by wishful thinking?  A more difficult task has never been invented.  Overcoming the self to arrive at truth is more rewarding than the view from Mount Everest!  And remember, No one has gotten there alone.  Seek ye first the kingdom of God and His righteousness.

God bless.

Consider Circular Reasoning!

Wikipedia has it thus:  Circular reasoning (Latin: circulus in probando, “circle in proving”;[1] also known as circular logic) is a logical fallacy in which the reasoner begins with what they are trying to end with.[2] The components of a circular argument are often logically valid because if the premises are true, the conclusion must be true. Circular reasoning is not a formal logical fallacy but a pragmatic defect in an argument whereby the premises are just as much in need of proof or evidence as the conclusion, and as a consequence the argument fails to persuade.

“a logical fallacy in which the reasoner begins with what they are trying to end with.”  As applied to the age of the Earth, scientists who believe the theory of evolution have taken a 19th century theory concerning the age of fossils in sedimentary rock and used it to date the rock containing similar fossils elsewhere.  They use the fossils to date the rock and rock to date the fossils—circulus in probando—it begins and ends in the theory of the age of the fossils.  It is, therefore, a logical fallacy! “A fallacy is the use of invalid or otherwise faulty reasoning,”(Wikipedia)

Our education system has indoctrinated everyone under its influence into this fallacious reasoning as if it were absolute truth!  The only truth in it is that there are fossils in sedimentary rock.  EVERYTHING beyond that is conjecture and theory. A theory requires proof. A theory of itself proves nothing!

Science is supposed to be about finding truth; make observations and theorize concerning cause.  The problem with the Theory of Evolution is that a theory was proposed specifically to reject God’s revelation of creation and then the search was on to find supporting evidence!  Denial of truth never, ever changes the truth, but it can sure make the ‘wisdom of the wise into foolishness’ when the denial is exposed for what it truly is!

Remember ‘The Emperor’s New Clothes’?  It was the truth revealed.  The Theory of Evolution is exactly the Emperor’s new clothes trying to hide the truth of creation.  Eventually everyone will see it for what it really is.  Pray the Spirit will open the eyes of the blind.

Consider Evolution!

The Geological Column, that is the layers of sedimentary rock containing fossils that paleontologists have theorized shows the millions of years of history that they theorize proves the Earth has to be millions to billions of years old, is real enough.  Are the evolutionary theories concerning it correct? No.

The revelations concerning cellular structure and DNA have shown beyond doubt that for macro-evolution (the change from one species into another) to occur, there would have to be millions of individual and very specific changes to the billions of very specific molecular protein codes which define the creature or plant (or any living organism).  ALL of these specific changes would have to be made simultaneously for a viable new species to occur.  The most knowledgeable geneticists have no clue what that combination of changes would have to be even for the simplest organism to become a different kind of organism AND it would have to (in just about all cases) have to occur in both male and female versions at the same time so the reproductive process could happen.  To be clear, micro-evolution are changes that occur within species and although these changes are sometimes used to try to prove Darwinian Evolution, that is not what is in view here.

Bear in mind: The theory of evolution is that all living organisms began by the chance happening of a single living organism coming into existence and then evolving into a different species and another and another, etc. “From chemical rich slime and a lightning bolt the first life sprang into being! Eventually, over the eons, man!”

There are those who are not sold on the idea of evolution as the foundation of our existence.  Some are even scientists.  Some are statisticians and they have tried to calculate the odds of all the changes necessary happening to produce the event of a new species coming into existence.  To put the result in some sort of perspective, you specifically, have the same chance of winning  the power-ball lottery at least a billion times in a row as for one species to turn into another and breed true.

Make no mistake, belief in evolution is a religion, a religion that is rooted and founded in rejecting the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, the Father of Jesus Christ.  Evolutionists are willing to believe anything that casts doubt on the Creator God because they categorically reject that God’s moral law is supreme and they will be held accountable.

There is no middle ground, no fence to straddle.  God will not be mocked.  He told us the history of the world and His Creation cries out to us the truth of His handiwork.  Because there is not one shred of evidence to prove its validity, the belief in Darwinian Evolution is willful blindness to His truth.

Think you might like the view of someone else?

http://evolutionfacts.com/New-material/frozen_planes.htm

http://www.beforeus.com/third.php

http://evolutionfacts.com/what’s_new.htm

“Faith is:  the substance of fossils hoped for,  the evidence of links unseen.” M.M.

Consider Faith

What is faith?  The Bible says it is the evidence of things not seen, the substance of things hoped for.  But what is it today in what is, arguably, post-Christian America?

Faith is basically what I believe to be true but can’t directly prove; but it is subject to change if new information comes up.  Its like planned obsolescence: something newer and more believable is almost sure to come up, so my faith, my belief is always subject to change.  That’s not TRUE faith.  Sorry.

So, what IS true faith? Well first, what is the source of true faith; saving faith; faith that really counts and is not subject to change because its source is unchanging?  For by Grace are you saved, through faith, and THAT not of yourselves lest any man boast!   What does THAT mean?  By Grace, through faith and that NOT of yourselves!    

By God’s Grace alone you are given the inestimable gift of TRUE faith; the ability to believe the Truth of God, that He has revealed to us through the Scriptures of the Holy Bible.  I see the eyes rolling from here, so please let me spell it out:  

We are children of Adam and as such have nothing in us that could or would choose to believe His Truth if left to our natural selves.  Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.  It is by Grace we are saved.  It is only the Regenerate heart that is capable of seeing (really accepting) the truth of the kingdom of God!  It is only the Regenerate heart that believes the evidence of the kingdom of God.  It is only the Regenerate heart that feels the substance of the kingdom of God.  The true faith of which God is speaking is not what we believe, but what we know beyond any reasonable doubt about HIS truth. It is not simply that I believe in Jesus Christ.  It is that I know He is the Only Begotten Son of the Father.  It is that the Father of Jesus Christ is the One True God of creation.  There is no other.  It is that the Word became Flesh and dwelt among us.  It is that The Father gave His Son, a willing sacrifice so that you and I could have eternal life!

The Case for the Personification of Evil

Before making the case for the personification of evil, perhaps it would be best to define just what personification is:  http://www.dictionary.com has it:  the attribution of human nature or character to animals, inanimate objects, or abstract notions, especially as a rhetorical figure. | That is assigning personality traits and a name to something, in this case, evil.  i.e. Satan, Lucifer, father of lies, the serpent in the garden, Old Dragon, roaring lion, etc. so that it might be examined as another person with whom we may or may not want to associate ourselves.

Now that that is cleared up, these are questions that must be answered beyond a reasonable doubt to prove the existence of Satan as an individual spiritual being.  Unless it can be shown beyond a reasonable doubt that Satan is a person and not a personification, then our entire concept of the source of sin and death and evil in this world must be reexamined to get to the truth of its origin.

Beginning in Genesis 1:27-28:

27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.

God’s command to man must be defined if we are to understand his duty before God in the beginning.  Little has been done beyond the assumption that we know what being fruitful and multiplying means to God.  But do we?  (Strong’s #6509, ‘fruitful’ is  grow and #7235, ‘multiply’ is be in authority)

Next there has been some discussion of the term ‘replenish’.  (Strong’s #4390 consecrate) It has even been the basis of the idea that Satan destroyed the first creation and Adam was given the task of rebuilding it to its intended glory. But can that reasonably be?

Next is the command to ‘subdue it’. (Strong’s #3533 is conquer, subjugate which means to ‘overcome by force’)  Which (to me) utterly begs the question:

What was there in the creation God pronounced “very good” that required of Adam that he ‘overcome by force’  something in it?

The key to this answer lies in the last phrase of the verse, ‘over every living thing that moveth upon the earth’.  We assume that understanding this to mean everything outside of himself is the intent.  The problem with that assumption is that it utterly fulfills the old wisdom of what assuming anything ends up doing:  it makes an ass out of u and me!  (Ass-u-me)  How so?

Man is the only morally accountable being God revealed in the creation account.  That is what it means to be created in the image of God and bear His likeness. We are morally accountable because we were given the laws: thou shalt and thou shalt not referring to the way we are to conduct our interaction with God and with man.  God revealed no other creature that was given such law.  All other creatures listed in the creation account are subject only to the laws of nature.

The Word of God, His revelation to us, concerning that accountability is the very first thing He revealed and the very first thing we reject in our understanding of that revelation!  We reject it by assuming that subduing all the rest of the creation is what was meant when in point of fact the only thing that really mattered was that we bring ourselves into absolute submission to the will of God each and every time we are tempted to defy Him.

He created us to be at the top of the list of ‘every living thing that moveth upon the earth’!  Not absent from it!  Adam failed.  He failed willfully and willingly to obey God’s command never to eat of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.  What is that fruit?  It is the idea that Adam could decide for himself what was good and what was evil.  Could it have been an ‘apple’ that he took a bite of?  Sure!  But taking the bite proved the condition of his heart and as Jesus said in Mark 7:

18 And he saith unto them, Are ye so without understanding also? Do ye not perceive, that whatsoever thing from without entereth into the man, it cannot defile him;

19 Because it entereth not into his heart, but into the belly, and goeth out into the draught, purging all meats?

20 And he said, That which cometh out of the man, that defileth the man.

21 For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders,

22 Thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lasciviousness, an evil eye, blasphemy, pride, foolishness:

23 All these evil things come from within, and defile the man.

I know that this was given in answer to the objection to eating food sacrificed to idols.  But Jesus went beyond the physical to the spiritual truth of the matter.  That is what we are all called to do!  Eternal life is a spiritual truth!

How does this all apply to the ‘Personification of Evil’?

The answer to that does not begin with the Serpent in the Garden.  It begins with the creation of Eve!  I see the leap to conclusions and the name calling and the dismissal of everything up to this point that this fool has written!  Please, give me one more minute to make a point.

Genesis 2:

20 And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field; but for Adam there was not found an help meet for him.

21 And the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof;

22 And the rib, which the Lord God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.

23 And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.

We can imagine the physical activity here rather easily.  But what is the spiritual outcome?  Yes, there have been many commentaries that say Eve was taken out of the side of Adam indicating she was his equal, and all that is correct as far as it goes.  But let’s take it a step farther.

Eve was created.  But she was not created from the dust of the earth as was Adam.  She was created out of Adam.  She was a distillation of his nature and created to be his ‘help’, ‘meet’ for him.  (Strong’s #5858 for both!: aid, help)

It was Eve who saw that the fruit was good for food, pleasant to look upon, and good to make one wise.  She was deceived, Adam was not. (1st Tim. 2:14) Eve was in the transgression but it was Adam’s disobedience that brought the curse of sin upon all mankind.

Romans 5:13 states:

12 Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:

13 (For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law.

14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam’s transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come.

(The parenthetical phrase begun in verse 13 continues through verse 17.)

Why?  Why did Adam sin?  Given the source of sin described by Jesus in Mark 7, how are we to understand God’s declaration of His creation as ‘very good’?  There are only two possibilities. One is that it was a moral certification.  If that was the case, then for Adam to sin against God, he would have to change his own nature from one of absolute moral submission, to one of utter moral rebellion.  Or two, it was a declaration of fitness for purpose.  As a declaration of fitness for purpose we have to trust God to reveal to us what that purpose is.  Did He?  Did God reveal what the purpose of His creation is?  Yes!  He did!

In the end, the bride of Christ will join Him in eternity.  The bride of Christ will exhibit one overwhelming character trait that cannot be denied.   We will be holy as He is holy.  Holy means separate. It means to set one’s self apart from something.  God reveals only one trait that He holds to the superlative, His holiness, and we are to be holy as He is holy.  So, what did he set Himself apart from in eternity?  Evil!  How does He define evil?  He defines evil as the ultimate worship of self.  He defines evil as pure selfishness.  The fruit of the Spirit, each of them, are manifestations of selflessness.

Adam sinned because he sought the throne for himself.  He did not care that if he said ‘No’ to Eve, God could and would forgive the transgression.  He cared only that he decide, and he would rather die than submit and obey.

The only way for man to be willingly and willfully holy, which is the purpose of God for his creation, is for man to see for himself, individually, first hand, leaving no room for doubt that to put self before everything else, is to reject the spiritual meaning of life.  That is the life that God blew into the nostrils of man.

Adam, the man of flesh, the elder, must be subdued by the younger Adam the man of Spirit, to live in holiness.  That is what Adam the elder, rejected and by doing so brought death to the younger.  It is the younger that must then be born again in each of us.  It is the younger that must learn and exercise holiness against the strength and wiles of the elder.  In doing so the purpose of God is served in this creation.  In doing so the ultimate plan of God will come to fruition. It is in trying to understand this that the question of ‘free will’ must be addressed and the truth of it accepted.

The revelation of evil as the serpent in the garden, Satan in the book of Job, the devil tempting Jesus,  all of its manifestations in this world, form the personification used in Scripture to allow us to externalize who we are in the flesh.  Who of us wants to admit that we absolutely would have been screaming, “Crucify Him!” with wholehearted enthusiasm had we been standing in the crowd when Pilate said he could find no fault in this man?  Which of us wants to believe as Paul did that ‘I am the chiefest of sinners’?

Personification is the only reasonable way to rightly understand the evil spirit of this world.  Evil must be subdued within and shunned without.  It must begin in our own hearts and minds.  It must be given no quarter in precisely the same way Jesus gave it no quarter.  He answered His temptation the same way we must:  It Is Written…!  Holiness puts God on His throne.

Every argument for the person-hood of Satan, demons, the devil, evil, et al. can be better answered,  and its presence in Scripture understood, by seeing the idea personified. Describing them as a persons is used by God to convey spiritual truth just as using the four types of ground in the parable of the sower conveys the spiritual truth of the four types of  reception the Word gets in the hearts of men.  We do it all the time in plays and stories to make concepts of good and evil easier for children to understand.

I close with these words of Jesus so that those of you with ears to hear may begin to understand: Matthew 13:10-13

10 And the disciples came, and said unto him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables?

11 He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given.

12 For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance: but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath.

13 Therefore speak I to them in parables: because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand.

14 And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Esaias, which saith, By hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and shall not perceive:

15 For this people’s heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them.

16 But blessed are your eyes, for they see: and your ears, for they hear.

17 For verily I say unto you, That many prophets and righteous men have desired to see those things which ye see, and have not seen them; and to hear those things which ye hear, and have not heard them.

Externalizing evil is always easier than facing its truth within us.  God knows that, Satan does too!

Also, you may, as you read the passages above in light of the Strong’s definitions I have inserted, come to the shocking conclusion that God’s revelation becomes much more revealing of His ultimate plan!

The question you must ask yourself at this point (if you really care) is:  Do I still believe beyond a reasonable doubt that Satan is a person?

The sequel to this is examining the truth of how regeneration must, of necessity and beyond a reasonable doubt,  precede faith!

May all who read this be blessed.