What is holiness? Holiness is knowing all that is unholy in every detail, then willingly and willfully without compunction or equivocation, rejecting all that is unholy and the emotional thought processes that lead to unholiness, for in that is eternal joy and peace.
Why do we want to see children color inside the lines in a coloring book? When a 2 to 3 year old first puts crayon to paper the results are a bit chaotic; a lot of scribbling and sweeping the crayon back and forth with no regard for the image printed on the paper; and, if we aren’t careful, the walls get decorated, too! But, with some guidance and practice, building hand-eye coordination, beginning to see the lines on the paper as a picture that needs color, they start putting colors in place within the framework of lines and eventually a beautiful picture emerges. It has order and symmetry. It turns out to be a work of art of which the child can be proud. The color edges are sharply defined by the black lines and there are no stray overlaps marring the work.
What has this to do with knowing the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob and His Son Jesus Christ?
Well, just as there are lines that are meant to bound the colors on the pages of a coloring book, there are rules established for us so we can properly interpret and come to a correct understanding of the written word. There are rules of grammar. There are rules of sentence structure. There are words whose meanings are established and given to us in dictionaries, lexicons, and thesauri. There are literary genres which, by their very structure, are meant to be understood in different ways.
These are the lines within which the purity of our understanding is meant to flourish. These are the lines within which, when all put together, form all of our understanding; the way we see the world; the way we perceive truth, know right from wrong, know who we are, know Who God is, and hopefully, what our purpose in this life is.
The written word does not have the tone, inflection, body language, facial expression, or the myriad of other tips and cues which can shade the understanding of the spoken word. We must rely on established standards; rules created specifically so a proper and correct interpretation of it can be attained. Sadly, in today’s world, many think that we can play fast and loose with the written word and still get what was meant to be conveyed to us. That is like taking crayons, sweeping them randomly across the page and expecting the intended picture to emerge pure and true.
The standard for written communication in the English language at the time the early English Bibles were produced was ‘Logic’ by Isaac Watts. It was the standard for nearly two centuries. The text has, of course, been replaced, but the rules laid down in it have not substantively changed, merely the methods of presenting them. And, as I said, it was the standard for how to express ideas in written form so the reader could get, as unambiguously as possible, what the author intended.
A second text, ‘Protestant Biblical Interpretation’ by Bernard Ramm, gives us the rules established over the millennia for properly interpreting God’s Word. Ignoring the very first rule in it has brought Christianity to the confused and impotent condition in which it is found today! What is that rule? Simply put, it is this: ‘On any given topic in Scripture, the implicit is to be understood in light of the explicit.’ That is to say that the passage which more clearly deals with a particular subject is to govern how we understand a passage that is less clear.
At this point, I am going to give examples that have very far reaching ramifications theologically. There are three passages I would like for us to consider. The first seems, on the surface, to be perfectly clear and yet, if this first rule is implemented that is absolutely not the case.
The three scriptures are from and Job 1:6-12, Jeremiah 17:9-10 and Mark 7:18-23. All are considered to point directly to the source of evil. First Job 1:6-12: * 6 Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan came also among them. 7 And the Lord said unto Satan, Whence comest thou? Then Satan answered the Lord, and said, From going to and fro in the earth, and from walking up and down in it. 8 And the Lord said unto Satan, Hast thou considered my servant Job, that there is none like him in the earth, a perfect and an upright man, one that feareth God, and escheweth evil? 9 Then Satan answered the Lord, and said, Doth Job fear God for nought? 10 Hast not thou made an hedge about him, and about his house, and about all that he hath on every side? thou hast blessed the work of his hands, and his substance is increased in the land. 11 But put forth thine hand now, and touch all that he hath, and he will curse thee to thy face. 12 And the Lord said unto Satan, Behold, all that he hath is in thy power; only upon himself put not forth thine hand. So Satan went forth from the presence of the Lord. *
This is one of the proof texts for the existence of Satan as the fallen angel, father of lies, Lucifer, deceiver of Eve, instigator of the Fall, etc. There is a small book called ‘Why America Is Not In the Bible’ by Glenn Dawson that lays out this most widely held doctrine of Satan. There is only one small problem with this passage used as proof text for this almost universally held doctrine. Whether Job is a real historical person or not, the book itself is written in the genre of a play. To interpret it as historical narrative, which using its passages as proof texts proving literal truths requires, is to twist the Scriptures to support an idea that may not be true!
I guess this would be a good time for a side trip into the definition of truth. Can we all agree that truth is that which accurately relates reality? When we speak truth we are either speaking or writing something that is true according to our knowledge and belief, according to our point of view. There is a problem with this definition of truth. Do you know what it is? Our knowledge and beliefs are imperfect, so that which relates truth, true truth, as Dr. Sproul put it, is that which relates what is true, relates reality, in the eyes of God, from His perfect point of view! And since the Bible is the Word of God, we should, as believers, be about seeking the truth from His point of view, revealed in it to us. I believe that is part of the reason Paul told Timothy to ‘study to show thyself approved, a workman rightly dividing the word of truth.’
Now, back on track! Since Job was written as a play, the characters in it, whether real world figures or not, are used to portray traits of character and circumstances for us to examine in ways that are otherwise difficult or impossible. Good and evil have always been grist for playwrights. Characters are created with these traits portrayed in ways that make them appear as good characters in terrible circumstances or evil, dastardly characters we love to hate. But since evil is many times visited upon the ‘undeserving’ from sources beyond control or understanding it is easy to create an evil character whose sole mission is to visit affliction on the ‘undeserving’.
Job is not written as historical narrative, that is, a telling of actual historical events, but there is much to be gleaned about God and man from Job, however, it should not be considered a proof text for the existence of a spiritual being named Satan. We should look elsewhere for the source of evil in this world. Job suffered theft, vandalism, natural disaster, death of his sons and daughters, the scorn of his wife, disease, the ridicule and misunderstanding of his friends, all of which we classify as evil and all of which are known to be part and parcel of the condition of the fallen world in which we live. He suffered and could not understand why. He hated himself and his life and even cursed the day of his birth, but not once did he blame God for his misfortune or his pain and suffering. There are lessons about character and enduring trials to be learned from Job; but as a proof text for the existence of Satan? No. It is the ideal example of an implicit text on the source of evil. It is implicit, not because it is unclear, but because it is not written as historical narrative but as a play whose characters and their interaction give us insight into the fact that there is a far deeper game afoot than we can know.
The next scripture is Jeremiah 17:9-10:
9 The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it? 10 I the Lord search the heart, I try the reins, even to give every man according to his ways, and according to the fruit of his doings.
Much of the book of Jeremiah is written in the form of ‘poetic oracles’. The passage above is considered part of a sermon involving signs of the coming judgment on Israel. Jeremiah is warning the people of the true condition of man, all mankind including Israel; calling them to repentance. The people refused to accept this truth and continued to believe that they were better than others because they were chosen of God.
When God says clearly and with no equivocation at all that ‘the heart is deceitful above all things‘, there is only one way to understand what He means: First there is no greater deceiver than the heart of man, and it has no greater goal than to mislead and misdirect us; to do all in its power to turn us away from truth and righteousness. The second part is that it is desperately wicked, which means that it constantly casts about, is always trying to find a way to pervert truth and righteousness, to turn us against what is pure and right. We are forced to answer for ourselves just how much untruth does it take to create a lie. Aren’t the best lies just shading the truth enough to misdirect one from doing what is right? When faced with owning up to something we have done wrong, isn’t our first inclination to find a way to make ourselves not look so bad? Shade the truth just a bit? Share the blame just a little? The heart is the ultimate master of not only self-deceit, but of deceiving others if given the circumstances. I don’t know about you but I have known people who would lie when the truth would serve them better! And this is the literal truth of what God has revealed to us concerning who we are as unregenerate sons of Adam. The unregenerate will do anything to deny that truth. God alone knows that heart because He alone is not affected nor infected by it. He is holy, separate from all that is unrighteous and untrue. God knows our hearts and yet showed us how merciful He is through His only Begotten Son, Jesus Christ. Didn’t Jesus say, ‘If you have seen me, you have seen the Father?
The third passage is Mark 7:18-23:
* 14 And when he had called all the people unto him, he said unto them, Hearken unto me every one of you, and understand: 15 There is nothing from without a man, that entering into him can defile him: but the things which come out of him, those are they that defile the man. 16 If any man have ears to hear, let him hear. 17 And when he was entered into the house from the people, his disciples asked him concerning the parable. 18 And he saith unto them, Are ye so without understanding also? Do ye not perceive, that whatsoever thing from without entereth into the man, it cannot defile him; 19 because it entereth not into his heart, but into the belly, and goeth out into the draught, purging all meats? 20 And he said, That which cometh out of the man, that defileth the man. 21 For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders, 22 thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lasciviousness, an evil eye, blasphemy, pride, foolishness: 23 all these evil things come from within, and defile the man. *
This follows an episode with the Pharisees in which they called Him and His disciples down for eating without washing their hands. They claimed it would defile them and be sinful. Jesus made it perfectly clear (and this is written as historical narrative) that it is what comes out of the heart of man that defiles; that nothing entering into the man from outside can defile him. He goes on to give a fairly comprehensive, though not exhaustive, list of sinful thoughts and behaviors that do defile the man and again makes it clear they are not from any external source! That source according to our Lord Jesus Christ, is our own unregenerate heart. He said nothing entering in can defile… He didn’t say, ‘nothing except Satan.’ He didn’t say, ‘nothing except demons.’ He didn’t make any exceptions!
We are misled today. We work on the principle that we’re all basically good, when in Romans 3 it clearly states:
*9 What then? are we better than they? No, in no wise: for we have before proved both Jews and Gentiles, that they are all under sin; 10 as it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one: 11 there is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God. 12 They are all gone out of the way, they are together become unprofitable; there is none that doeth good, no, not one. *
We have conflated doing good things with being basically good. They are not now and have never been the same. We deceive ourselves. We want to believe the best about people and have let ourselves believe the lie! It isn’t that we can’t know the truth and still be merciful! What it is, is that our nature is so in rebellion that we are willing to deny the word of God on the subject even though we know the truth. We see the character, Satan, so clearly depicted in Job and latch onto it as absolute truth when we know it isn’t. We want to blame somebody, anybody else, for our sin. What was the first thing Adam said when God said, ‘What have you done?’. He said, ‘That woman You gave me…!’. He blamed God and Eve for his crime!
For us, as Christians, to color inside the lines, we have to repent; change our minds about what really is truth and Who is in charge. There is a Calvinist doctrine; the first of the five points, called ‘Total Depravity’. It has been vilified by many in today’s church as misrepresenting man who was ‘made in God’s image’ (as if we know what that really means). Yet Jesus Himself said that all sin comes from within. Total depravity does not mean that man, or any particular man, is as evil as he can possibly be, only that all men, who are sons of Adam, have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.
How can we stay inside the lines? There are so many doctrines that are created by religions today! We need to repent; go back and seek true truth!
Consider the human will. Dictionary.com defines it: The ability to choose, think, and act voluntarily. For many philosophers, to believe in free will is to believe that human beings can be the authors of their own actions and to reject the idea that human actions are determined by external conditions or fate. Say what?
Human beings can choose actions that are not determined by external conditions or fate? I’m going to jump right to the ad absurdum argument here: If the action one chooses is not determined by external conditions and one chooses to live forever, what is it that eventually overwhelms the will and brings about death? And if anything does or is able to do so then by the definition above, the will is not truly free!! Yet this is the very corner stone of free will theology.
I used the example above as the ad absurdum argument. It is absurd because no son of Adam expects to live forever in this world no matter how much they might want to cheat death. Many have had their bodies frozen, placed in cryogenic stasis awaiting some hoped-for scientific break-through that will bring them back. My guess is their hope is in vain.
Now, a second ad absurdum argument can be stated: I choose Jesus Christ as my personal Lord and Savior. I have cast out devils in His name and done many wonderful works in His name. He cannot and will not turn me away because I chose Him! Yet in Matthew 7 Jesus is quite clear: * ‘ 22Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? 23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.’* It obviously cannot be my will that determines Jesus’ decision.
Yes, I generally choose my actions, but even in that my will is limited by a great many factors! My will cannot propel my body fast enough to run a 3 minute mile. My will is not subtle enough to give me the ability to produce a perfect copy of the Mona Lisa. My will is not economically savvy enough to choose a scheme, stock, bond, crypto-currency, whatever, to make me a millionaire overnight! Yes, I can make choices, but the consequences of those choices are not completely subject to my will, now, are they! There is a very old saying, ‘The best laid plans of mice and men often go awry!’ It is as true now as it was for Adam. My choice to try, does not guarantee success, does it?
So, the question virtually jumps into the mind of the Christian, ‘Why have I been told all my life that I have to choose Jesus or I’m going to Hell?’ Well, given all the above, that is the question, isn’t it.
The definition above speaks of the will as being the author of our own actions. It seems obvious enough that the results of our will to do something, can be largely beyond our control which leaves the actions themselves. Choosing to live forever is a free choice. But the action-actually living forever-does not seem to be within the power of the ‘free’ will to accomplish. So at this point it is necessary to revisit the definition of ‘free will’.
Another, and I believe much more correct, definition of free will is this: Free will is the ability to choose, any at all, of the moral options offered in a given situation.
The word moral in this case means the degree to which any action in a given situation aligns with God’s revealed will concerning that action. It might also be thought of as a scale from doing that which perfectly pleases God to doing that which is perfectly abhorrent to Him. Of course, only God can choose what pleases Him and what displeases Him. No created being has that prerogative.
God is the Lawgiver! He has already determined the morality of any action we can take in any given situation. A good example is the parable of the good Samaritan. When Jesus asked who acted as the neighbor should, even the scribes and pharisees had no doubt.
We color within the lines when we ascribe the power of God to God not man! Only God has free will. That should be obvious when we profess that He is Omnipotent, Omnipresent, and Omniscient. God cannot be Omnipotent if our actions limit Him in any way. God cannot be Omniscient if we say or do anything that He has not already accounted for, since He perfectly knows the end from the beginning. God cannot be Omnipresent if He is not always in the right place at the right time to do what is necessary to bring His perfect plan to fruition.
We color within the lines when we ascribe the limitations of man to man not God! In our natural state as unregenerate sons of Adam, we are slaves to sin. It isn’t that we can do no civil good, but that we are not, and cannot be perfectly Holy as God is Holy. Instead of free will, we have what might be termed ‘free agency’ that is, the ability to choose our actions based upon our strongest inclinations at the time. We are responsible to God and the rest of humanity for those actions. In a manner of speaking, one who has free will is a law unto himself; while one who is a free agent can make choices according to his own lights, but he is still responsible to others for the consequences of the choices he makes.
To ascribe to man the free will many claim he has, is to usurp an attribute of God with which we were never endowed. In fact, to do so describes quite clearly the action of which Scripture says Lucifer was guilty and was cast out for it. He claimed he would sit in the throne of the Most High. God has revealed to us that such a goal will not end well!
Coloring outside the lines is easy; don’t have to be careful; neatness doesn’t count. The same is true with biblical interpretation, if you don’t really care about staying within the bounds of what reason and revelation dictates is the truth it seeks to relate, it is possible to make Scripture say virtually anything; and sound good doing it. The problem is, in the end, all you have is something that tickles the ears and there is no absolute truth to it. Isn’t that where majority Christianity stands today?
We may not like what God has to say about a lot of things. Much of what He has to say cuts right to our hearts, convicting us of the sin we own. He calls us to repentance. He calls us to admit that He is right and righteous. He calls us to know His mercy. He calls us to color within the lines. How will you answer?
The Mona Lisa is considered to be one of the greatest works of art in the world. The mastery it exhibits is virtually without equal. It was not, however, created without paints, pigments, thinners, rags, brushes, patience, skill, knowledge, understanding of how the finished product should look, and a pallet upon which the paints were mixed and textures tested, remixed and retested until the result was just what the master decided was needed at a particular time and in a particular place in the final work of art.
In the same way, but without trial and error, the Creation, beginning to end, is God’s pallet. For all the mixing and remixing and chaos we perceive, the end will be an eternal masterpiece. To believe otherwise is to deny the perfect plan of God. To rest in that belief, to place our faith in Him and His will for us, is to end our rebellion against Him. We don’t have to like what our current circumstances are. Like Abraham, we can question God! The thing about Abraham’s questions was that they were posed to better understand how merciful God is to the faithful, not how unmerciful He can appear to the rebellious. Abraham was the father of the faithful. He was trying to see the masterpiece God was creating; trying to see beyond the chaos on the pallet around Him. Where is your focus?
I selected the second possibility; the one with the comma after good.
The first possibility is out of the KJV. Stating positively that all things work together for good to them that love God, it then goes on to add ‘to those who are called according to His purpose’. It makes it sound as if only those who love God are called according to His purpose. Wasn’t pharaoh called, raised up, set apart, to fulfill a purpose of God? Did he love God? Not according to the Scriptures! I jumped to the conclusion that called and raised up are basically synonymous in relating the idea that one is being set apart, used according to the purpose of God. Does Strong’s bear out my conclusion? Strong’s #2822 called, Kletos is appointment. Who makes the appointment? Strong’s #5975 Raised, amad, is translated 15 times in Scripture as appointed. Again, Who does the appointing? God! And He says all things work together for good.
The third possibility is from Holman’s and is definite: All things work together only for the good of those who love God! And who might they be? ONLY those who are called according to His purpose! I used pharaoh in the example above. What about Jacob and Esau? God said that before they were formed in the womb, before they had done anything good or bad, Jacob have I loved and Esau have I hated, that the purpose of God might be fulfilled! I submit that both were called according to His purpose, and as such this translation written so that it is to be understood that all things work together for good only to those who love God shows how biased a translation can be. The same denomination that initiated this translation insists that God is Good, God is Love, God loves everyone, God is all-powerful, and that it is up to us to ask forgiveness BEFORE WE CAN BE SAVED.
Second Timothy 2:15 says ‘Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.’
My studies have led me to believe that the second possibility is the most correct. Indeed God does work all things together for Good! That is the whole purpose of this Creation! HIS creation! We are HIS creatures! In Romans 9:21 Paul asks ‘Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?’ He asks that question to force us to face the FACTS of a Creator GOD! He planned and created this entire universe. Should we not face the fact that it is HIS to do with as HE pleases? Should we not face the fact that all of it is created to serve HIS purpose and is called to do so? Should we not face the fact that every vessel is made for a purpose either to honor or dishonor? That being the case, all things work together for good because that is the ultimate purpose of God for His Creation! Then we can understand that all things work together for good BOTH to those who love God AND to those who are called according to His purpose!
We can believe that in spite of the perceived evil around us, because the evil in this realm was banished from the eternity we are destined to share with Jesus Christ!
And one little comma is the difference. God uses the small things to help us know Him if we are willing to look. It is not our job to decide who is lost and who is not. It is our job to live according to Micah 6:8.
He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the Lord require of thee,but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God?
In light of this translation of Matthew 5:43-46
43 Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy.
44 But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
45 That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.
46 For if ye love them which love you, what reward have ye? do not even the publicans the same?
Which of the following translations of Romans 8:28 is most correct:
28 And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose.
28 And we know that all things work together for good, to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose.
28 We know that all things work together for the good of those who love God: those who are the called according to his purpose.
Defend your selection!
Before making the case for the personification of evil, perhaps it would be best to define just what personification is: http://www.dictionary.com has it: the attribution of human nature or character to animals, inanimate objects, or abstract notions, especially as a rhetorical figure. | That is assigning personality traits and a name to something, in this case, evil. i.e. Satan, Lucifer, father of lies, the serpent in the garden, Old Dragon, roaring lion, etc. so that it might be examined as another person with whom we may or may not want to associate ourselves.
Now that that is cleared up, these are questions that must be answered beyond a reasonable doubt to prove the existence of Satan as an individual spiritual being. Unless it can be shown beyond a reasonable doubt that Satan is a person and not a personification, then our entire concept of the source of sin and death and evil in this world must be reexamined to get to the truth of its origin.
Beginning in Genesis 1:27-28:
27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.
God’s command to man must be defined if we are to understand his duty before God in the beginning. Little has been done beyond the assumption that we know what being fruitful and multiplying means to God. But do we? (Strong’s #6509, ‘fruitful’ is grow and #7235, ‘multiply’ is be in authority)
Next there has been some discussion of the term ‘replenish’. (Strong’s #4390 consecrate) It has even been the basis of the idea that Satan destroyed the first creation and Adam was given the task of rebuilding it to its intended glory. But can that reasonably be?
Next is the command to ‘subdue it’. (Strong’s #3533 is conquer, subjugate which means to ‘overcome by force’) Which (to me) utterly begs the question:
What was there in the creation God pronounced “very good” that required of Adam that he ‘overcome by force’ something in it?
The key to this answer lies in the last phrase of the verse, ‘over every living thing that moveth upon the earth’. We assume that understanding this to mean everything outside of himself is the intent. The problem with that assumption is that it utterly fulfills the old wisdom of what assuming anything ends up doing: it makes an ass out of u and me! (Ass-u-me) How so?
Man is the only morally accountable being God revealed in the creation account. That is what it means to be created in the image of God and bear His likeness. We are morally accountable because we were given the laws: thou shalt and thou shalt not referring to the way we are to conduct our interaction with God and with man. God revealed no other creature that was given such law. All other creatures listed in the creation account are subject only to the laws of nature.
The Word of God, His revelation to us, concerning that accountability is the very first thing He revealed and the very first thing we reject in our understanding of that revelation! We reject it by assuming that subduing all the rest of the creation is what was meant when in point of fact the only thing that really mattered was that we bring ourselves into absolute submission to the will of God each and every time we are tempted to defy Him.
He created us to be at the top of the list of ‘every living thing that moveth upon the earth’! Not absent from it! Adam failed. He failed willfully and willingly to obey God’s command never to eat of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. What is that fruit? It is the idea that Adam could decide for himself what was good and what was evil. Could it have been an ‘apple’ that he took a bite of? Sure! But taking the bite proved the condition of his heart and as Jesus said in Mark 7:
18 And he saith unto them, Are ye so without understanding also? Do ye not perceive, that whatsoever thing from without entereth into the man, it cannot defile him;
19 Because it entereth not into his heart, but into the belly, and goeth out into the draught, purging all meats?
20 And he said, That which cometh out of the man, that defileth the man.
21 For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders,
22 Thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lasciviousness, an evil eye, blasphemy, pride, foolishness:
23 All these evil things come from within, and defile the man.
I know that this was given in answer to the objection to eating food sacrificed to idols. But Jesus went beyond the physical to the spiritual truth of the matter. That is what we are all called to do! Eternal life is a spiritual truth!
How does this all apply to the ‘Personification of Evil’?
The answer to that does not begin with the Serpent in the Garden. It begins with the creation of Eve! I see the leap to conclusions and the name calling and the dismissal of everything up to this point that this fool has written! Please, give me one more minute to make a point.
20 And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field; but for Adam there was not found an help meet for him.
21 And the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof;
22 And the rib, which the Lord God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.
23 And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.
We can imagine the physical activity here rather easily. But what is the spiritual outcome? Yes, there have been many commentaries that say Eve was taken out of the side of Adam indicating she was his equal, and all that is correct as far as it goes. But let’s take it a step farther.
Eve was created. But she was not created from the dust of the earth as was Adam. She was created out of Adam. She was a distillation of his nature and created to be his ‘help’, ‘meet’ for him. (Strong’s #5858 for both!: aid, help)
It was Eve who saw that the fruit was good for food, pleasant to look upon, and good to make one wise. She was deceived, Adam was not. (1st Tim. 2:14) Eve was in the transgression but it was Adam’s disobedience that brought the curse of sin upon all mankind.
Romans 5:13 states:
12 Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:
13 (For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law.
14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam’s transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come.
(The parenthetical phrase begun in verse 13 continues through verse 17.)
Why? Why did Adam sin? Given the source of sin described by Jesus in Mark 7, how are we to understand God’s declaration of His creation as ‘very good’? There are only two possibilities. One is that it was a moral certification. If that was the case, then for Adam to sin against God, he would have to change his own nature from one of absolute moral submission, to one of utter moral rebellion. Or two, it was a declaration of fitness for purpose. As a declaration of fitness for purpose we have to trust God to reveal to us what that purpose is. Did He? Did God reveal what the purpose of His creation is? Yes! He did!
In the end, the bride of Christ will join Him in eternity. The bride of Christ will exhibit one overwhelming character trait that cannot be denied. We will be holy as He is holy. Holy means separate. It means to set one’s self apart from something. God reveals only one trait that He holds to the superlative, His holiness, and we are to be holy as He is holy. So, what did he set Himself apart from in eternity? Evil! How does He define evil? He defines evil as the ultimate worship of self. He defines evil as pure selfishness. The fruit of the Spirit, each of them, are manifestations of selflessness.
Adam sinned because he sought the throne for himself. He did not care that if he said ‘No’ to Eve, God could and would forgive the transgression. He cared only that he decide, and he would rather die than submit and obey.
The only way for man to be willingly and willfully holy, which is the purpose of God for his creation, is for man to see for himself, individually, first hand, leaving no room for doubt that to put self before everything else, is to reject the spiritual meaning of life. That is the life that God blew into the nostrils of man.
Adam, the man of flesh, the elder, must be subdued by the younger Adam the man of Spirit, to live in holiness. That is what Adam the elder, rejected and by doing so brought death to the younger. It is the younger that must then be born again in each of us. It is the younger that must learn and exercise holiness against the strength and wiles of the elder. In doing so the purpose of God is served in this creation. In doing so the ultimate plan of God will come to fruition. It is in trying to understand this that the question of ‘free will’ must be addressed and the truth of it accepted.
The revelation of evil as the serpent in the garden, Satan in the book of Job, the devil tempting Jesus, all of its manifestations in this world, form the personification used in Scripture to allow us to externalize who we are in the flesh. Who of us wants to admit that we absolutely would have been screaming, “Crucify Him!” with wholehearted enthusiasm had we been standing in the crowd when Pilate said he could find no fault in this man? Which of us wants to believe as Paul did that ‘I am the chiefest of sinners’?
Personification is the only reasonable way to rightly understand the evil spirit of this world. Evil must be subdued within and shunned without. It must begin in our own hearts and minds. It must be given no quarter in precisely the same way Jesus gave it no quarter. He answered His temptation the same way we must: It Is Written…! Holiness puts God on His throne.
Every argument for the person-hood of Satan, demons, the devil, evil, et al. can be better answered, and its presence in Scripture understood, by seeing the idea personified. Describing them as a persons is used by God to convey spiritual truth just as using the four types of ground in the parable of the sower conveys the spiritual truth of the four types of reception the Word gets in the hearts of men. We do it all the time in plays and stories to make concepts of good and evil easier for children to understand.
I close with these words of Jesus so that those of you with ears to hear may begin to understand: Matthew 13:10-13
10 And the disciples came, and said unto him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables?
11 He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given.
12 For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance: but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath.
13 Therefore speak I to them in parables: because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand.
14 And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Esaias, which saith, By hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and shall not perceive:
15 For this people’s heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them.
16 But blessed are your eyes, for they see: and your ears, for they hear.
17 For verily I say unto you, That many prophets and righteous men have desired to see those things which ye see, and have not seen them; and to hear those things which ye hear, and have not heard them.
Externalizing evil is always easier than facing its truth within us. God knows that, Satan does too!
Also, you may, as you read the passages above in light of the Strong’s definitions I have inserted, come to the shocking conclusion that God’s revelation becomes much more revealing of His ultimate plan!
The question you must ask yourself at this point (if you really care) is: Do I still believe beyond a reasonable doubt that Satan is a person?
The sequel to this is examining the truth of how regeneration must, of necessity and beyond a reasonable doubt, precede faith!
May all who read this be blessed.